Audeo Systems - technology meeting people

Saving money

Here is a real life example, where a client produced these figures in his consideration of implementing a videoconferencing project.

The application:

A construction company, with 5 offices spread around the UK.

The main problems:

Directors would meet for Board meetings, both main Board and subsidiary, once a month. This could mean many individuals travelling a number of times per month. Meetings typically took two hours in duration.

The monthly costs of the meetings:

Direct Costs
Item Cost
Travel to meeting location - petrol costs etc £300
Subsistence £125


Indirect Costs
Item Cost
Lost productivity through travel, say £50 per hour per Director £1,000


Total Cost £1,425 per meeting
Monthly meeting cost £7,125


The Video Conference solution:

It was decided to hold two meetings each quarter by video, the third would be face to face as before, and become a quarterly review. This left the face to face meetings costing £2,375 per month.

Equipment Costs
Item Cost
Appliance based Video Conferencing solution for medium sized room with plasma screen and ability to share & display full XGA graphics. Price includes support & training. £50,000 (5 x £10,000)
2Mb SDSL lines - annual cost, albeit non dedicated use £18,000
Total Equipment Costs £68,000


Monthly Costs
Item Cost
Depreciation of Capital equipment over 4 years £1,042
SDSL monthly cost £1,500
Monthly Costs £2,542

MONTHLY SAVING of £2208 is achieved by replacing 2 out 3 meetings with Video Conferencing meetings. OR, PUT ANOTHER WAY, THE EQUIPMENT PAID FOR ITSELF IN LESS THAN 2 YEARS.

Not only savings... but also the Directors now find that they are able to be more productive.

  • Directors have a more beneficial work/life balance.
  • Meetings are more action based, more efficient and have a greater amount of decisions made.
  • More adhoc meetings take place in addition to action urgent needs rather than waiting for the monthly meeting. This creates competitive advantage.
  • The company is more environmentally friendly using less fuel for travelling.
  • Directors & employees are happier and less stressed.

AND IT COSTS LESS TO ACHIEVE ALL OF THIS THAN THE ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION - TRAVELLING!

Money

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

back to top